Family and divorce Law continue taking victims just “way it works” – does it really?!

Posted: 1/21/2009 9:14:45 PM
Posted By: Mick

Christmas shooting in Covina, CA also known in media as “Santa Claus shooting” is just another sample of total failure of today’s family and divorce law’s. This time executioner was Bruce Jeffrey Pardo. With all do respect to the victims of this event I have to point out few things that are also elaborated in my book “Family Testament”;

Bruce Pardo was a nice guy, educated, faithfull… here is what people who knew him said about Bruce:

-- and incredulous reactions from people who knew Pardo as a reliable church usher and good, but quiet, neighbor.
Pardo, several neighbors said, was a quiet, unassuming man who enjoyed tending his garden and regularly ushered at the evening Sunday Mass at Holy Redeemer.
"Bruce?" said an incredulous Jan Detanna, the head usher at the church, when told about the attack by a reporter on the phone. "I'm just -- this is shocking. He was the nicest guy you could imagine. Always a pleasure to talk to, always a big smile."
[Written by htbw on Dec-27-08 11:25am
From: soyawannaknow.blogspot.com]

Media also reported that Bruce Pardo had no criminal record and no history of violence, according to police.

What made him to go this way and became a mass murderer?

Good answer to that question offers Robert Hebblethwaite in his comment. Here is what he said;

Santa Claus Shooting

Christmas time can be very emotional for many people. Suicides are extremely common at this time. However, when you provoke a person with injustice, tyranny, and oppression, cutting to the very heart of his life by taking away his children, his home, and his reputation, you can create a scene such as occured in Covina, CA Christmas Eve. Bruce Pardo, obviously overwhelmed by the injustice heaped on him by the divorce courts, shot and killed his ex-wife, and seven other people, then set fire to the house. Three additional persons are still missing and presumed dead. Several more were injured, including at least two children. Pardo was described as quiet and friendly by neighbors and co-workers. An all-around nice guy, the last person they would suspect of a rampage like this. Unfortunately, the injustices of the family courts, heaped upon most men in courts across the country, is more than sufficient to trigger such an explosive, emotional reaction. Our courts and legislatures really need to examine the facts, to see the persecution of men, and to make changes to alleviate the volatile emotional impact on them.
POSTED BY: Robert Hebblethwaite, London
POSTED ON: December 27, 2008

And I do agree on this with Robert 100% especially after I have read a report from “LA TIMES”:

Steve Erwin, a high school friend, said Pardo had called him Tuesday to tell him he would be visiting him in Iowa for two weeks, starting Christmas morning. But he never showed up. The last time Pardo visited was in October, upset because he was going through a divorce, Erwin said. "It sounded like his wife was taking him for whatever she could," he said.
Erwin said he talked to Pardo the day after the Dec. 18 divorce settlement hearing.
"I told him it's great it's over with now," Erwin said. "He said he told the judge he would have still went to counseling with [Sylvia] and worked it out. He still loved her."
"He was quirky and different, but a super-nice guy," said Rachelle Maxheimer, 40, a former roommate.
[LA TIMES]

So, how many more things like this should happen before we see the change in our family and divorce laws? How many lives should be taken away before we take action and fix these “laws” that most of those who are involved in providing them also justify them with a floscula: “That’s the way it works”. Obviously nothing really works a “way it works” and if something doesn’t works or works wrong way producing more crimes and social problems instead of solving them and serving society should be terminated and replaced with better laws. Could it be that next victims are members of your family? Are you really willing to take that risk and just wait until really happens to you before you take action?

Another detail from “LA TIMES” report also took my attention;

Scott Nord, Sylvia Pardo's divorce attorney, said she never expressed fear of Bruce Pardo. Clients who fear that their husbands may hurt them usually tell their attorneys and seek a restraining order before filing divorce papers, Nord said."The issue of domestic violence or fear for her safety never came up," he said. "In fact, she never said Bruce even owned a gun."
[LA TIMES]

Mr. Nord should keep in mind that these days restraining order is most of the time abused against fathers, children and family as institution in general. It’s often based on woman lies and it has for purpose to justify her kidnapping of children which is blindly and almost always supported by law enforcement because “that the way it works”. Children kidnapping from the fathers home have for purpose of later financial robbery through another discriminatory agency that calls “Child support agency” that openly discriminate mens even through the employment process. Just go visit this agency in your city and check out how many mens are employed in there and how many womans. No further explanation needed. The second purpose of justifying children kidnapping from the fathers using restraining order is to allow to woman to brainwash them and to public officials involved in the case to coach them for possible use against their fathers in the court and entire process in general. Since Bruce Pardo didn’t has any children with his wife (all three were from other mens) logically his wife didn’t need restraining order Mr. Nord and that’s why it never occurs beside the fact that Bruce as many other husbands and fathers wasn’t violent against his wife. That’s the fact that you “forgot” to tell to public Mr. Nord.

Mick Karabegovic